BBC's Broadcasting House
This post is primarily about the BBC’s flagship building in London’s Portland Place rather than the corporation itself, but it would be nigh on impossible to talk about Broadcasting House without talking about the business that uses it.
The British Broadcasting Corporation was established on 1st January 1927 after it was granted a royal charter to succeed the fledgling British Broadcasting Company. This charter, which technically allows for independence from any state control, is normally renewed every ten years, and the current one expires on 31st December 2027.
The freedom from government control does not necessarily mean that the corporation is a law unto itself, as it has to operate under an agreement with the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport that allows regulation by the government-approved Office of Communications, more commonly known as Ofcom. Amongst other things, Ofcom has wide-ranging powers across the telecoms industry that ‘protects the general public from harmful or offensive material’.

The other thing to understand is that the BBC is funded, not by an independent media tycoon, but by the British public, and is paid for by an annual television licence fee which is ‘charged to all British households, companies and organizations using any type of equipment to receive or record live television broadcasts or to use its streaming service, iPlayer.’ In other words, even if you don’t watch or listen to any BBC channels or stations, you still have to pay the licence fee if you watch live TV from independent channels on any device. This fee (currently £169.50 per annum) is set by the British government and needs approval by parliament. The revenue raised from the licence fee in 2022/23 was £3.741billion.
These assets may be huge, but so are the BBC’s outgoings. In the UK alone, the corporation owns (at the last count) 154 buildings in all corners of the nation with major production locations in Cardiff, Glasgow, Belfast, Birmingham, Salford (Manchester) and Bristol as well as London. In recent years however, many departments have relocated from London to Media City in Salford, but the capital still retains departments at White City, Maida Vale and its headquarters at Broadcasting House.

Broadcasting House is located at Langham Place/Portland Place, roughly half way between the tube stations at Oxford Circus and Regents Park, which meant that when building work started on the studio in 1928, it had to be constructed over the top of the Bakerloo Line. Designed by George Val Myer in the art deco style, the steel frame was faced with Portland Stone and completed in time for Henry Hall and his BBC Dance Band to record the first broadcast here on 15th March 1932. It was officially opened two months later on 15th May 1932.

Adorning the outside of this Grade II listed building are several carvings by Eric Gill. Apart from being a renowned sculptor, he was also responsible for designing the Gill Sans typeface amongst other things, and as he was also a religious man, there was no reason to think that his sculptures on Broadcasting House would become controversial, but they have.
His commission from the BBC was to carve five modern sculptures to compliment the modern-looking building; one in the entrance hall recording the names of the people involved in the building’s creation, and four on the exterior based on Prospero and Ariel, the fictional characters in Shakespeare’s play The Tempest. Prospero was to serve as a symbol of wisdom and benevolence, and Ariel, the invisible spirit of the air, as a personification of broadcasting.
During the winter of 1931-1932 Gill carved three ariel panels on the sides of the building – ‘Ariel Piping to the Children’ on Langham Street, and on Portland Place, ‘Ariel Hears Celestial Music’ and ‘Ariel Between Wisdom and Gaiety’.

The sculpture that was to have the biggest impact was the one of Prospero and Ariel that was situated above the main entrance on the outside of the building. If we were to offer Gill the same benevolence that Prospero supposedly had, then it could be argued that perhaps the sculptor intended for the bearded figure of Prospero to represent the Almighty presenting his son to the world. Others saw it differently, not least because the size of a certain part of Ariel’s anatomy appeared to be over generous, and it became necessary for Gill to get his tool bag back out again and chisel a bit off. Even then, there were calls for it to be removed (the statue I mean).
The controversy didn’t end there though because Gill kept some personal diaries which only came to light after his death with the publication of a biography by Fiona MaCarthy in 1989. Those diaries revealed that Eric Gill wasn’t as righteous a person as he would have people believe. In them he described how he sexually abused his adolescent daughters, had an incestual relationship with at least one of his sisters and even practiced sexual experiments with a dog.
Following the revelations and the exposure of other high profile paedophile cases, there were calls for the removal of Gill’s public works, and that included Prospero and Ariel at Broadcasting House, but the BBC decided to leave it where it was. In January 2022 a man climbed up to the statue with a hammer and started trying to remove it himself and was arrested for his trouble. The following year another unsuccessful attempt was made by someone else who thought it shouldn’t be here – but it still is.
Instead of removing the statue altogether, the BBC has spent upwards of £50,000 repairing it, but they say that the costs won’t fall on licence fee payers as the damage is covered by insurance. Their argument for repairing rather than removing it is that the actions of an artist has to be separated from his work, and to save you the trouble of travelling up to Broadcasting House to judge for yourself, I’ve included a couple of pics of the controversial Prospero and Ariel below.


In order to save costs, the BBC decided to transfer most of its London operations to Broadcasting House, and beginning in 2003, it embarked on a major renovation programme which included building a new extension and refurbishing the old one.
The first of two phases involved renovating the old building and building an extension to the east, which was initially called the Egton Wing (after the Egton House offices that were originally here if you really must know). Completed in 2005, the new extension was officially opened by Queen Elizabeth II on 20th April 2006, and in 2012 was renamed the John Peel Wing in honour of the well-known disc jockey.
Phase two involved the creation of a large wing to the rear which joined the old and new buildings together, and at the same time provided a plaza that could be used for outdoor events. This extension was also opened by Her Majesty on 7th June 2013.
The combined complex now houses (with the exception of Radio 5 Live and Radio 5 Sports Extra which have moved to Salford Quays) the entire television and radio operations of BBC News and World Service.

Ever since the BBC has been broadcasting news, it has maintained its desire for impartiality, and it’s something I not only applaud, but also endeavour to practice myself when blogging about controversial subjects.
The corporation has a massive task on its hands where this is concerned because as the medieval English poet John Lydgate once said (and later adopted by Abraham Lincoln) “you can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time”. It’s no wonder then that occasionally the broadcaster has found itself involved in criticism. That said, I think it’s fair to say that for most of the time most people have accepted most of what the BBC has broadcast as being mostly impartial – but times are changing.
These days, there are many more places to find out what’s going on in the world. Mainstream Media (MSM) has found itself in competition with social media and other sources, some of which are dubious to say the least, but it’s led to people questioning the information that we’re constantly being given, and I have to admit to being one of those people.
I rarely accept one source of information as the correct one, and spend umpteen hours referencing and cross referencing different sources before I’m satisfied that I have a trustworthy account of something I’m researching. All this delving has led me to the conclusion that MSM is only telling us what they want us to hear.
There’s nothing wrong with that of course providing we have a choice of paying for what we want to read, watch or listen to, and there have been calls for the licence fee to be scrapped and replaced with subscription-based channels. In 2022, there were 40,654 people who were prosecuted, given a criminal record, fined up to £1,000, and still had to pay the licence fee when they refused to pay it.

On winning the general election in July, the new Labour government immediately re-affirmed its commitment to the licence fee until at least 2027, presumably when the charter comes up for renewal. In the meantime the public will have to continue paying the licence fee if they don’t want to fall foul of the law.
Interestingly, outside the John Peel Wing is a statue of a former BBC employee – George Orwell. I’m sure most of you will know that he was the author of Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four, a novel about a future world where three totalitarian states control the world and are constantly at war. One of those states is Oceania which is ruled by a regime that has unswerving obedience to its leader, Big Brother, and is subjected to that obedience through brainwashing, propaganda, and a crackdown on dissent.

Above the sculpture by Martin Jennings is an inscription from Orwell’s proposed preface to Animal Farm which calls for the idea of free speech in an open society – “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear”.
I’m guessing that those who support the BBC as a public broadcaster see that statement as freedom of expression, but the question has to be asked if that only works if you agree with the news reports that come out of Broadcasting House.

POSTED – AUGUST 2024
Originally posted 2024-08-30 09:10:19.
Loved that, Malc. It’s really good. I did not know about 95% of the history. And it’s thought-provoking – which is engaging. I do depend on the BBC to be generally impartial, but given where it is it cannot be so; it will always lean toward its predominant and the prevailing culture.
I confess that, until recently, it did a pretty good job of trying to steer a ‘reasonable’ course, but I do think it now strays a little into what you might call the ‘what we think you should do’, or ‘PC’ level of debate. This can be patronising – and it encourages far right criticism – some of it vile. I think it’s the best we have though – and I do believe it tries.
Personally, I make no attempt whatsoever to refrain from expressing a view on my blog. I’m not accountable to the public. Now I think about it, I should try to be more controversial. National Trust shops are boring and their cafes are mediocre! There; I feel better now. 🙂
Thanks Mike. I’m glad you enjoyed it, and it was meant to be thought-provoking. Rightly or wrongly I try to be as impartial as possible because I like people to make up their own minds about a topic. I prefer the media in general to tell me the facts, not what they think I should know, and I would be a bit hypocritical if I did the same. That said, if you read between the lines in my articles you’ll know what I think anyway. Free speech is important, but I’m always mindful that other people won’t always see things the same way as I do and I wouldn’t go out of my way to upset somebody, but if it does, then so be it. There are plenty of people out there queueing up to be offended, and it’s also extremely worrying to me that serious criminals are being let out of prison to make way for people who have posted something inappropriate on social media in the heat of the moment. Those in charge can shut down freedom of speech, but we shouldn’t let them shut down our freedom to think.
The National Trust. Now is that the same organization that looks after our heritage but wants to cancel our history?
Oh, the National Trust – like the NHS, where would we be without it? It does stunning work and long may it continue – but is not a sacred cow.
Honestly, Malc, you never disappoint and I laughed at your detailed description of Eric Gill’s misbehavior, even with an unlucky dog! Your epic lesson in the history of the BBC is impressive in the amount of research, time, and effort, you put in to inform your readers. As always, your excellent photography brings your words to life! I still stick with BBC News as the most trustworthy, and worth paying the licence fee. I love Orwell’s motto from The Animal Farm, ” All pigs are equal but some are more equal than others” So apt always!
Thank you, Malc, again for your sterling work!
Joanna
Thanks for your in-depth analysis of this post Joanna and I’m pleased that it made you chuckle as well. Eric Gill seems like a wolf in sheep’s clothing if you ask me, and from what I’ve read George Orwell based Room 101 on his office at the BBC.
Thank you, Malc, you are a mine of knowledge!
Joanna
And none of it of any use 😀
Excessive modesty, Malc, is not a virtue! You deserve all the praise bestowed on you
Joanna x!
I’m not sure about that, but praise from my virtual sister is more than good enough x
An interesting post Malcolm. I’m glad you touched on the controversy surrounding the Eric Gill sculptures. As works of art I really like them and personally I would prefer them to stay, but I understand the views of those who call for them to be removed. As to the BBC itself, I think they do an excellent job in presenting the news in a largely impartial way and still rely on them as my main source. That doesn’t mean I think they always get it right but I believe they do so more often than any other news provider.
Thank you Sarah. I’m glad you found it interesting and I expected you to say that you follow the BBC for most of your news. Like most people I always used to, and in many ways I do think they are much better than the other MSM channels. That said, I look elsewhere most of the time for my news nowadays.
Very very interesting post Malc. Nicely presetned too. In Scotland that fee is a civil court matter so naturally not many of us pay it.
I never knew that!
Oh yeah and the Civil Courts are backlogged so they don’t generally entertian any attempt to prosecute. . In all matters we take advice from our younger girl who is a lawyer. She also tellsus that they actually have no right of entry– and she would know cos she sent one of their ‘staff’ away– and to catch us watching tv in our instance, they’d need a ladder up to our window and that would need the permission of the lady downstairs to put aladder in ehr garden. SO yeah.
That’s interesting. It no doubt depends on individual circumstances as to whether it’s worth the risk of not paying it, and obviously the law up there must be slightly different.
Oh yeah.. Have to say I don’t know many who do pay it.
Really informative and interesting!
I loved the information and the great images!
Thank you Luisa. Glad you enjoyed it 😊
I liked it very much!!!
💙
Very interesting Malc, and I truly admire George Orwell. Phenomenal pics too my friend. All the best and a great Friday to you!
Thanks as always Francesc. Have a great weekend, and I hope it’s cooling down a bit for you now
You’re welcome Malc, you too a good weekend for you! It has cooled off a bit, especially early in the morning, but it goes up to 30 in the afternoon. But it is fine as the breeze allows for pleasant days on the water. All the best.
Lucky you 😎
Interesting read Malc, an organisation as big as the BBC is never going to get everything right and there will always be people trying to abolish it. I think in the main it does a good job in difficult and these days rapidly changing media world where the likes of me and you still tune in but many young people don’t. Personally I think its value in the developing world with the World Service and in authoritarian states where media is tightly controlled is worth the licence fee I pay.
Thanks for your comment Jim. It’ll be interesting to see how other people feel. I tend to get most of my news from other sources these days.